- Trigger / problem
- An employee or manager submits an incident, exposure, injury, privacy, safety, or infection-control concern through the approved intake.
- What it reads
- The submitted facts, event time, location, people involved, immediate danger indicator, event category, response plan, owner directory, and open corrective actions.
- What it decides
- Which preapproved routing path and urgency flag apply. Ambiguous, potentially severe, or time-sensitive events take the higher escalation path.
- What it does
- Time-stamps the intake, protects the source record, alerts the named owner and backup, opens response tasks, and tracks acknowledgments and corrective actions.
- Human approval / takeover
- A person makes every clinical, legal, employment, reportability, notification, and corrective-action decision.
- Systems needed
- A secure form, restricted document store, task system, urgent notification route, and current response directory.
- Privacy / access
- Initial intake asks only for facts needed to route safely. Medical, exposure, accommodation, disciplinary, patient, and investigation records use separate restricted access.
- Logging & failure handling
- Record submission, access, routing, acknowledgments, edits, decisions, and closure. If an urgent alert fails, notify the backup through a second approved route and keep the task open.
- Success metric
- Time to owner acknowledgment, incidents with complete required records, and corrective actions closed by the approved due date.
- What the practice owns at handoff
- The intake, routing map, escalation directory, record structure, response tasks, logs, and operating guide.
- Good fit when
- Incidents are uncommon but high-stakes, and staff need one clear way to report and route them.
- Not a fit when
- The practice expects software to replace emergency response, clinical evaluation, an attorney, or the designated compliance and safety leads.